In a recent legal development, the Delhi High Court issued a stay on summons to Sunita Kejriwal, the wife of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, in connection with allegations of her name being enlisted in the voter lists of two assembly constituencies. This article explores the details surrounding this case and the implications it may have on the political landscape.
Background
The controversy began when BJP leader Harish Khurana filed a complaint, alleging that Sunita Kejriwal had violated the provisions of the Representation of the People (RP) Act. According to Khurana, Sunita Kejriwal was registered as a voter in both the Sahibabad assembly constituency in Uttar Pradesh and the Chandni Chowk assembly constituency in Delhi. This raised questions about her eligibility to be listed as a voter in two different locations.
The Legal Battle
The case took a significant turn when Metropolitan Magistrate Arjinder Kaur summoned Sunita Kejriwal to appear in court on November 18. The summon was based on the belief that a prima facie case existed against her for alleged violations of Section 31 of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1950. Section 31 deals with making false declarations, and the offense carries a maximum punishment of two years in jail.
Sunita Kejriwal's Defense
In response to the allegations, senior advocate Rebecca John, who represented Sunita Kejriwal, argued before the high court that the trial court's order lacked proper application of mind. She emphasized that possessing two electoral cards was not inherently an offense, and there was no concrete evidence to suggest that Sunita Kejriwal had made any false statements.
Delhi High Court's Decision
Justice Amit Bansal of the Delhi High Court issued a notice to the State and the complainant while considering Sunita Kejriwal's plea challenging the trial court's order. The high court decided to stay the operation of the impugned order and listed the matter for further hearing on February 1. This stay order has temporarily halted the trial court proceedings and gives time for a more detailed examination of the case.
The Implications
The legal battle surrounding Sunita Kejriwal's voter list allegations has political and legal implications. As the wife of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, her legal troubles could potentially impact the political landscape in Delhi. The final outcome of this case will be closely watched by political observers and the public.
In conclusion, the Delhi High Court's decision to stay the summons to Sunita Kejriwal in the voter list allegations case marks a significant development in this legal battle. It provides a breather to Sunita Kejriwal, who has maintained that she did not commit any wrongdoing. As the case unfolds, it will continue to be a point of interest for those following the political landscape in Delhi, and its final resolution will have lasting implications.
Posts
0 Comments